NETHERLANDS CARIBBEAN BANKS AND REGULATORY ISSUES
A bank has less freedom than an ordinary legal entity
What would be the requirements, from a regulatory point of view, if a Netherlands Antilles bank wished to sell its entire business or a substantial part thereof? Would it require approval from the Netherlands Antilles Central Bank (de ‘Bank van de Nederlandse Antillen’)?
Generally, if the activity at a bank is characterized as some form of financial reorganization, for example, the prior approval of the Central Bank is required. The bank is also obliged to immediately inform the Central Bank in writing of any resolution for complete or partial liquidation or …
Read the rest »
THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN AND ITS CIVIL LAW SYSTEM
Abstract rules are the starting point
The Netherlands Antilles are an autonomous part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The Kingdom of the Netherlands is composed of three parts: the Kingdom in Europe (popularly known as Holland, north of Belgium and west of Germany), the Netherlands Antilles (in the Caribbean Sea, north of Venezuela), and Aruba (also in the Caribbean Sea, north of Venezuela). Within the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Netherlands Antilles are autonomous except for matters of defense and foreign affairs. Curacao is the largest of five islands that form the Netherlands Antilles. The other islands are Saba, St …
Read the rest »
LIFTING OF AN ATTACHMENT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN (II)
Defendant has to show that the claim is invalid
Article 705, Paragraph 2 of the Netherlands Antilles Code of Civil Procedure states that the lifting of an attachment may be ordered if it appears summarily that the claim is invalid.
According to existing case law of the Dutch Supreme Court (see for instance Supreme Court dd June 14, 1996, NJ (Dutch Law Reports) 1997, 481), this means that the plaintiff (i.e. the party requesting the attachment be lifted in summary proceedings), with due regard for the limitations of summary proceedings, should establish a prima facie case (aannemelijk maken) that the …
Read the rest »
WHAT DAMAGES ARE RECOVERABLE UNDER ARUBAN LAW? (II)
Case law
The Supreme Court in its case law has held that relatives of a deceased person are only entitled to sue for damages against the person liable for his or her death, if and to the extent that their death has left them in need. The extent of need is measured by the standard of living of the surviving relatives during the life of the deceased. See, for example, Supreme Court dated December 13, 1985 and Supreme Court dated February 28, 1986. This rule may be considered one of the fundamental principles and values of the Aruban legal system, …
Read the rest »
A JOINDER BETWEEN PARTIES IN THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN
An interest must be proved
When two parties are involved in legal proceedings a third party may request permission to join the proceedings thereby to joining with one party in raising defense against the other (‘voeging’). Alternatively, a third party may request permission to intervene (‘tussenkomen‘) in pending proceedings, in which case neither party is joined.
The Dutch Supreme Court (May 3, 1957, NJ 1959, nr. 62) ruled that a joinder between parties in pending proceedings may only be sustained if the party requesting the joinder have an evident interest in supporting one of the parties’ positions, and thus in …
Read the rest »
DUTCH CARIBBEAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
The legal effects doctrine: an exception to the lex loci delicti rule
Under Dutch Caribbean rules of private international law, a claim arising from an unlawful act is governed, in the absence of a choice of jurisdiction by the parties, by the law of the country were the unlawful act was committed (lex loci delicti). However, this rule may possibly not apply if the tortfeasor and the injured party are both residing in a country other than that where the unlawful act was committed and if the legal effects occur entirely in the other country. This is the so-called legal …
Read the rest »