BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THE DUTCH ANTILLES (V)
Restrictions on termination
With regards to damages, the aim thereof is generally to restore the creditor to the position he would have been in had the contract been fulfilled. In case of breach of contract, the damages will usually be assessed by considering the situation the creditor would be in if restored to the position he would have been in had the contract been performed properly, by looking at costs incurred, wasted expenditure, any loss of profits etc.
The Netherlands Antilles Civil Code will generally allow an injured party to claim damages based on the expectations/positive interest, i.e. the position …
Read the rest »
BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THE DUTCH ANTILLES (IV)
Non-performance as a response to non-performance
Whenever a party to a contract is faced with non–performance by the other party, the party’s first reaction might well be to suspend its part of the contract. In the legal sense of the word, suspending or withholding performance may be described as both a defense and a self help remedy, which a party can use when the other party does not perform its obligations under the contract. By its very nature it is a temporary remedy. As long as one party is in breach and the other is withholding its performance, the contract …
Read the rest »
BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THE DUTCH ANTILLES (III)
Different cases of breach of contract
Any question of breach starts with an inquiry into the type of obligation at hand. It is necessary to know more about the type of obligation at hand in order to determine whether a party has failed to perform that obligation. When determining whether a party has failed to perform, it should be remembered that an obligation may carry with it a degree of ‘strictness’, ranging from a firm commitment, e.g. commitment to provide annual audited financial statements, to an obligation to use reasonable care and skill to achieve certain goals.
The Netherlands Antilles …
Read the rest »
BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THE DUTCH ANTILLES (II)
Entitlement to specific performance
Under the Netherlands Antilles Civil Code the demand for specific performance is not a remedy for breach of contract in a strictly legal technical sense. In this system the entitlement to specific performance is a consequence of the duty to perform a (contractual) obligation. The contract itself, and not the breach of it, entitles the creditor to specific performance. If non–performance amounts to a breach of contract, i.e. meaning that a party does not perform though it should perform, the other party may be entitled to damages or termination of the contract.
However, in some cases, …
Read the rest »
BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THE DUTCH ANTILLES (I)
Failure to properly perform
Under the Netherlands Antilles Civil Code (CC) breach of contract is defined as a failure to properly perform, perform on time, or to perform at all, which failure is attributable to one of the parties If a debtor breaches his obligations there are various courses of action available to the creditor. Firstly he may claim specific performance, secondly he may claim damages, whether or not in addition to specific performance, and thirdly, he may demand dissolution of the contract, with or without damages.
The CC distinguishes between excused and non–excused non–performance. According to Article 6:74 CC …
Read the rest »
FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS UNDER THE LAWS OF ARUBA (I)
What are called ‘franchises’ are not seldom mixed type agreements
Franchise agreements are not defined in any Aruban statute and are not subject to any specific Aruban legislation. The franchise agreement is a sui generis agreement, subject to the general law of contracts. Distribution agreements are not subject to any specific Aruban legislation either, and are, as with franchise agreements, also subject to the general law of contracts.
In accordance with the general law of contracts, parties are free, in principle, to agree on whatever they wish. However, certain restrictions are imposed by the general principle of Aruban law that …
Read the rest »
STRUCTURING TRANSACTIONS IN THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN, THE SKY IS THE LIMIT
Example: Parallel debt structures under Dutch Caribbean law
In a parallel debt structure, a company (the borrower) acknowledges a debt to an appointed agent by promising to pay the agent an amount equal to the sum of the borrower’s obligations under the (syndicated) loan agreement with the lenders. Thus an independent, parallel debt is created between the borrower and the agent for which it is (further) agreed that this debt (not only becomes due and payable but also) will be considered paid and discharged at the same time and to the same extent as the underlying loans so that (of …
Read the rest »
GENERAL CONDITIONS UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DUTCH CARIBBEAN
General conditions may be nullified
Since 1 January 2001 the Civil Code (CC) of Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles contains a section on general terms and conditions. By including this section in the CC the legislator tried to strengthen judicial supervision of the terms of general conditions in order to protect contracting parties against the use of general conditions, since they, generally, have no knowledge of, or influence on, the contents of these conditions.
The CC gives a broad definition of general conditions. When a certain clause or condition is used in a number of contracts then the clause or …
Read the rest »